Painting in large, metaphorical brushstrokes here. Use any interpretation you like. This story has been told many times, over many millennia, in so many ways. The way I understand it is this:
We were created. We had no personal hand in that. However it all happened, we were not involved.
It doesn't matter which god we attribute with creation, be it a deity or a physical process. What matters is the fact - we know it to be fact these days - that life here began, and was made possible, by processes and events "out there," or subjectively, "up there," in the heavens, of the Universe, of stardust. Our world, our experience here, our existence, is what feels to us as the "end result" of creation, though we rationally know there's more, and sometimes remember it, and sometimes conveniently forget. And, like an unborn child, we were not involved.
We have, however, also like a child born to this world, evolved. We were born to our Mother, the Earth, this beautiful planet, this "pale blue dot," which gave us sustenance, gave us room to grow, provided for us, appetitive parasites, and hid us from the processes to which she, too, is a slave, a cog in the machine, a vessel. Yet, like children, we also need our Father, want to know him, to understand him, to matter to him, be he unmoved mover or big bang. We've explored the world, work, study and strive to learn what makes it all tick, we study the skies, we discover - we evolve, changing now and then, searching for our heavenly, universal, perhaps metaphorical father, for the seed that made all this possible, for the force that gave us form.
We do this through religion, through philosophy, through science, we try to see our father, to know or understand our father, through inquiry and prayer we're pounding on his door, calling, begging for the keys, but when we think we've found them through our telescopes, our microscopes, spectrometers and colliders and we cross the threshold, we find only another locked door on which to pound and beg. Still, our father doesn't answer.
Perhaps he isn't there? Perhaps we've upset him? Perhaps he's ashamed of us? And now we look less to the father and more at ourselves, and we make a choice.
I'm not saying it's an easy choice.
Some of us take faith that our father lives within us, acts through us, exists in some way whether we know him personally or not, and find some measure of peace in the faith that evolution is a process of becoming, of discovering and unfolding the product of creation (in which we were not involved). We learn, we explore, we tell stories of what we find, we tell them to the lost, dejected, tormented. We are driven to this by kinship, by love for our brothers and sisters, that all may find this moment of refuge, this scrap of peace.
Some of us continue banging on that door, and seek the secret formula to convince our father to accept us, imperfect as we are - we worship, we create and follow rules, we guess at what he wants, and come to hate ourselves a bit (and sometimes those around us) for what we are, because as long as that door remains unanswered whatever we are must surely not be good enough, not ready.
And some of us get angry, and turn away from the father we take to have rejected us. "The hell with you," we say, "who needs you anyway? We'll get on just find without you," and we set about becoming what we believe a father should be, we make ourselves the centre of our own Universe. A father is the seed of creation, and we take the role upon ourselves, and strive to create our own reality, strive to manipulate, rape our Earthly Mother, explore that we may exploit. We convince ourselves that it's our role to get involved.
Here we become our own false idols, assume a false throne at the height of creation. We obscure the meanings of words to announce that childhood has passed and the time has come to be our own Masters. We create a language to tell a different story, one to entice, to persuade, to explain this new reality, to rewrite and cloud our memory, and to confuse.
Oh yes, we need a language to confuse. Because a father carries an unintelligible authority, inaccessible to the uninitiated. The seemingly unattainable wisdom of the father is what gives him power over his children. The harder the subjects of this earthly kingdom work to understand, the less they'll realize their capacity to question.
Here we reject our universal father, lose faith, forget that we were created and rewrite the narrative to focus it on ourselves, and here we fall, and there will be no peace in the chaos we create, and there will be no true love where the meaning of the word is redefined and clouded, and there will be no transcendental joy in a world reduced to power struggles and politics, and there will be no sublime, painful beauty without utility, guilt and shame, and the paths we follow, seeking Truth, won't lead us there, but instead will start and end with only us. We'll search in all the wrong directions and come full circle ravenously hungry, tired, ever unsatisfied by what we've seen, and create ourselves some frivolous purpose to keep our hands busy, unsettled by the cowardice by which we force ourselves to endure another empty night, another empty dawn, another empty day.
(You say you hate me, but I love you,
and I worry about you, and I
want you to be happy. You say
you're here to save me, to protect
me, but that makes me sad, and
I won't let myself stand and be counted.
It's not your fault. I can't save you
either. I took awhile getting here. I'm
not a warrior, not a doctor, not a
preacher, not a prophet. I tell stories.)
So we follow a path of our own choosing, and here we are, a world of 7 billion trying, in our own ways, to play our roles and make it work. If it sounds depressing or pointless, it needn't be. There's a tiny silver lining in a world of pain and fear and cruelty and crisis, and it's that what is cowardice in some manifests as hope in others, and where there's hope lives a measure of faith in the forces beyond our control, a subconscious message buried deep within ourselves, speaking of a truth that exists with or without our acknowledgment. The message is a promise that reality existed before us, will exist beyond our time, and that any way we look at it, we were created. The message is an open door, inviting us back to a place of childlike wonder and exploration and discovery. The message tells us we all fall off the path sometimes, and that there are ways to find ourselves, to orient and right ourselves when we get lost.
This hope is our lifeline. Does that seem flimsy? Irrational? Unscientific? Spooky, maybe? Look beyond the words. Don't just read them, try to feel them. The open-minded, the open-hearted, the curious and the unafraid, the unbound and unaffiliated, the truest children-at-heart are guided by a constant taught by religions, mythologies, philosophy and yes, even science, and that constant, stapled across the canons, is that we, mere mortal humans, are incapable of certainty, and this for the better. If we had certainty there would be nothing to live for, nothing to fight for, nothing to look for, no stories to tell, and nothing to do.
Sunday 31 July 2016
Sunday 17 April 2016
Nat Tries Real Yoga Instead of Fake Yoga and Can't Figure Out What She Thinks
I went to a hatha yoga retreat last weekend with my mother. Since then, I've been asked about it by a number of people. I've tried dodging that question, because I'd like to do it justice, but also because a week later I'm still trying to figure it out. Here are my preliminary thoughts & impressions:
My mother invited me because she had always wanted to go, but wanted company. This particular retreat was so important to her because it would include a banquet celebrating the yoga teacher's 50th anniversary of teaching yoga. Think about that for a minute - it's a big deal. Though she won't give an exact number for how long she's been his student, I can triangulate that if my mother started taking his classes shortly after her wedding, and well before I was born, she's been going to this particular yoga class for 35-38 years. Thinking about that for a minute, that's a pretty impressive number, too.
Why did I go? Because I'm insatiably curious.
The questions I was asked most over the course of the weekend:
Q: How long have you been his student?
A: I'm not.
Q: Have you practiced yoga elsewhere?
A: [stammer]
Why the stammer?
Because there are a few things I absolutely knew going into this. I knew, for instance, that the teacher is a 'purist,' and disapproves of the novelty yoga that gets mass marketed these days (Mom: "You shouldn't do hot yoga. My yoga teacher says it's bad for the heart"). I knew that, for instance, where I go into a hot yoga class in fluorescent gear and as close to naked as decency allows, that just wouldn't fly here. I knew that vegetarianism and sobriety would be important to the spirit of the weekend (Mom: "My yoga teacher doesn't eat any meat at all"). I also knew that Mom wanted me to be discreet about some of my daily vices (Mom: "I hope you won't get too offended by anything he says about smokers"). I also knew that the teacher leans toward actual teaching - I have a few books on my shelf that Mom's given me over the years because "my yoga teacher recommended them." They are about love, communication, mindfulness, and diet, and yes, I've read them and made use of them. They are mostly Buddhist, and I expected to hear more of the same.
So, back to the stammer - Have I practiced yoga elsewhere? I have. It is not the pure and disciplined hatha yoga these people are talking about. It's hot yoga and power yoga, the kind of self-centered yoga that comes without any significant spiritual aspect but makes me flexible enough to survive flying over the handlebars of my mountain bike without killing myself (so far) at best, and lets me spend time in an over-heated room, which I love, at worst. I'm not oblivious to the more traditional spiritual aspect - I just don't look for it from a yoga instructor who got a teaching certificate in a handful of weekends after a year or two of practice.
The answers I gave most over the course of the weekend:
A: It's interesting.
A: I was curious.
(as it turns out, people don't like these answers)
Into the classroom.
I expected that the pace of the classes would be slower than what I was used to. It was, and I was okay with that, since it had been awhile since I've done anything active at all. It was reassuring to not be run through poses like a game of high octane Twister. What I did not expect was that a more conservative pace would be just as effective as a workout. Further, I was right about the gear: Not too bright, not too tight, not too white.
I expected there to be a certain degree of teaching. I did not know what the nature of the teaching would be.
To illustrate the contrast, in the course of a run-of-the-mill yoga class I can generally expect the following (in a pixie-esque cadence & timbre): "Thank yourself for making this time for yourself today;" "Thank yourself for all the energy you've created in the last hour;" "Feel all the weight of your day and all of your daily responsibilities drift off as you focus on your breath;" "Carry this light and energy with you out into the world"... and more of the same.
Not here (Thankfully!).
The teaching in these classes went along more "real-world" lines. Awareness is important (mindfulness). If you want to live a long, healthy life, you need to be serious about making choices that lead to a long, healthy life. Don't smoke. Don't eat irresponsibly. Take care of your body. Get exercise. If you don't do these things, you aren't going to enjoy a long, healthy life. Proper Relaxation. Proper exercise. Proper Breathing. Proper Diet. Positive thinking and meditation.
The practice was simple, straight out of the Sivananda prescription, no surprises, no shortness of breath, anyone could do this, and comfortably. The teacher intertwined his lecture with the poses seamlessly, and it definitely put a very cool vibe to the experience. I had never known yoga to be this holistic, but here in this room it made sense.
And then the class took a turn I hadn't expected: The teacher opened the floor to questions from the class. That was completely new to me. Who asks questions in the middle of a yoga class? As it turns out, everybody. Not about the practice, either, but real, personal questions: difficulties recovering from injuries, difficulties communicating with relatives, difficulties adjusting to life changes, difficulties with holding onto personal beliefs in the face of obstacles and adversity, difficulty with taking care of oneself when too much energy gets spent taking care of others, trouble adapting the precepts of the teaching. And there were practical, if brief, answers to each, like a balm. This wasn't just a yoga class - this was a community, looking for direction from the teacher, who gives full credit to his guru.
So I understand why so many people at the retreat, like my mother, are completely dedicated to their weekly yoga class and so devoted to their teacher. To get a quick overview, there were 100 participants at this retreat, mostly middle aged women (but most if not all of the advanced students there were men). The oldest was in her mid-80's, and has been this teacher's student for 44 years. There were 4 women there who had been 40+ year students. Very few in the room had been students for less than a decade. At the vegetarian banquet dinner, an anniversary "tribute" video was screened, wherein a whole slew of students told about what a huge difference this teacher has made in their lives. The most popular statement, apparently, was that he "taught them patience," and helped them through some of the scarier or more difficult times in their lives. The love these students have for their teacher is absolutely real. All I could really think about in hearing all these accounts was: this teacher knew my mother when my parents had no money. He knew my mother when she was having kids, when she was butting heads with her daughter, when her parents died, when she was fighting breast cancer, when she was retiring. In a sense, I was meeting someone my mother called a yoga teacher, but was more practically an older, wiser friend who came just short of therapist, in a room of a hundred people with a similar story. It was extremely touching.
BUT. There's this nagging asterisk poking the back of my mind. False Buddha? (Someone I used to know wrote a great song about this kind of thing.)
I don't think so. It would be easy to look at someone who has a lot of charisma, who appears wise (or at least, wise enough), who people flock to and throw money at for direction and advice, and begrudge the guy for 'preying on the impressionable' or something to that tune. Here's the thing: I think this teacher honestly believes every word he speaks. I believe he is exactly what he claims to be. His fees notwithstanding, he's delivering a message of peace and strength to people who desperately want to hear it. He's helping people who want the help. I have trouble begrudging that. I would've liked some of the discussion to be more philosophical rather than dogmatic, more 'here's what suffering is and why it's a problem', and less 'the keys to life are a, b, and c, but I can understand why it wasn't (I think the answer involves the term Vinaya).
I got plenty of opportunities to talk to some of his students over the course of the weekend, too. Has Nat finally drank the kool-aid? I woke up in the morning on the second day of the retreat and walked the resort in my sweatpants and insanely comfortable shoes on a ravenous hunt for coffee (I can hear Mom in my head, saying "My yoga teacher doesn't drink any coffee at all"). Finding it took awhile. At breakfast mom and I sat with a group of women who spoke at length about the difficulties of vegetarianism and how their families are keeping them from going vegan. They spoke at length about their careful, conscientious food choices, complete with the spiritual slogans that come with them, until someone (not me) mentioned that she just can't give up her half-glass of wine with dinner. And then everyone else at the table agreed. An incredible guilt crossed the brave faces at the table, like watching keeping-up-with-the-Joneses-on-Facebook play itself out in real life, and it kind of made me sad. I looked at all of them and declared, "this is my third cup of coffee this morning, and I'm not sorry. This coffee is delicious." They would have been within their rights, in my opinion, to throw bread at me at that, but what I got instead was the sincerest gratitude. And then came the flood of honesty - everyday fears, everyday difficulties and day to day stuff, and some element of comfort, some element of sorority and common ground in knowing that the problems that plague you in your solitude are the same as those that plague others. Real connection, real compassion. Ordinary people, trying to get from today to tomorrow, and all of them blushing as they tell each other they hear their teacher's voice in their heads whenever they're grocery shopping, cooking, or are presented with 'problematic' ideas.
The weekend wasn't all feel-good-ness, though. The teacher stressed, "this isn't a yoga party. It's a yoga retreat." Some things didn't sit entirely well with me. I don't care for dogma, and I found some of the teachings bordering on the passive aggressive. My guard goes up when I'm told what to do or how to think, rather than being shown the argument and told to work it out. The official answer to that, I believe, would be that my ego is designed to dissuade me from seeing uncomfortable truths, or that I'm simply not ready to take the path seriously, and there's probably a strong argument to be made for both. There was some talk of past lives, but I'm neither Hindu nor Buddhist, and taking this idea literally rather than conceptually isn't worked into any metaphysical cosmology I'd bet on right now. And in general, I found this was not a very warm place for objectivity. I should have expected that - I've come across the 'just start practicing, the details will come later' approach to Eastern principles before. That said, I can agree to disagree, and I did find it curious that I genuinely looked forward to the next lecture, the next class, genuinely wanted to hear the man speak.
Sunday evening came along, the retreat came to an end, and when Mom asked what I thought of it, I didn't want to tell her I found it bittersweet, so I said as little as I could. Give it a few days, I thought, get back into work and routine and dirty laundry, get some perspective, but closer to the mark would be that I lost my objectivity. It was insidious. Over the course of the week, I found myself craving ayurvedic cooking and doing backward bends and stretches in the elevators, breathing exercises in the car. I caught a hot yoga class several days later, and found myself annoyed that so much was missing. Creepiest of all, I found myself hearing the yoga teacher's voice in my head and feeling guilty when, tired, I ordered a pizza for dinner, or every time I lit a cigarette or (believe it!) poured my third cup of coffee in the morning or walked through a store. Do I find myself believing in everything presented to me? Certainly not enough to pray, but maybe enough to throw some money at it. That I was affected, despite myself, is something worth considering.
Is this style of hatha yoga for you? Maybe, but I can't stress enough how different it is from mainstream fitness-oriented yoga. It really depends on what you want from it, and each offers things the other doesn't deliver. You won't work up a crazy sweat or be told to "find your own flow," but you'll come out of it with much more than your usual yoga-buzz. In a society where religion is quickly becoming a dirty word, the masses scramble for the ideology with which to hypocritically replace it and social identity groups and sub-classes clamber over each other pressing us to stand up and be counted, you could do worse than with a more natural practice based in the relative simplicity of human experience and human nature.
...And those are my thoughts for now.
more details? the parts I left out? email:
enoughtopray@gmail.com
My mother invited me because she had always wanted to go, but wanted company. This particular retreat was so important to her because it would include a banquet celebrating the yoga teacher's 50th anniversary of teaching yoga. Think about that for a minute - it's a big deal. Though she won't give an exact number for how long she's been his student, I can triangulate that if my mother started taking his classes shortly after her wedding, and well before I was born, she's been going to this particular yoga class for 35-38 years. Thinking about that for a minute, that's a pretty impressive number, too.
Why did I go? Because I'm insatiably curious.
The questions I was asked most over the course of the weekend:
Q: How long have you been his student?
A: I'm not.
Q: Have you practiced yoga elsewhere?
A: [stammer]
Why the stammer?
Because there are a few things I absolutely knew going into this. I knew, for instance, that the teacher is a 'purist,' and disapproves of the novelty yoga that gets mass marketed these days (Mom: "You shouldn't do hot yoga. My yoga teacher says it's bad for the heart"). I knew that, for instance, where I go into a hot yoga class in fluorescent gear and as close to naked as decency allows, that just wouldn't fly here. I knew that vegetarianism and sobriety would be important to the spirit of the weekend (Mom: "My yoga teacher doesn't eat any meat at all"). I also knew that Mom wanted me to be discreet about some of my daily vices (Mom: "I hope you won't get too offended by anything he says about smokers"). I also knew that the teacher leans toward actual teaching - I have a few books on my shelf that Mom's given me over the years because "my yoga teacher recommended them." They are about love, communication, mindfulness, and diet, and yes, I've read them and made use of them. They are mostly Buddhist, and I expected to hear more of the same.
So, back to the stammer - Have I practiced yoga elsewhere? I have. It is not the pure and disciplined hatha yoga these people are talking about. It's hot yoga and power yoga, the kind of self-centered yoga that comes without any significant spiritual aspect but makes me flexible enough to survive flying over the handlebars of my mountain bike without killing myself (so far) at best, and lets me spend time in an over-heated room, which I love, at worst. I'm not oblivious to the more traditional spiritual aspect - I just don't look for it from a yoga instructor who got a teaching certificate in a handful of weekends after a year or two of practice.
The answers I gave most over the course of the weekend:
A: It's interesting.
A: I was curious.
(as it turns out, people don't like these answers)
Into the classroom.
I expected that the pace of the classes would be slower than what I was used to. It was, and I was okay with that, since it had been awhile since I've done anything active at all. It was reassuring to not be run through poses like a game of high octane Twister. What I did not expect was that a more conservative pace would be just as effective as a workout. Further, I was right about the gear: Not too bright, not too tight, not too white.
I expected there to be a certain degree of teaching. I did not know what the nature of the teaching would be.
To illustrate the contrast, in the course of a run-of-the-mill yoga class I can generally expect the following (in a pixie-esque cadence & timbre): "Thank yourself for making this time for yourself today;" "Thank yourself for all the energy you've created in the last hour;" "Feel all the weight of your day and all of your daily responsibilities drift off as you focus on your breath;" "Carry this light and energy with you out into the world"... and more of the same.
Not here (Thankfully!).
The teaching in these classes went along more "real-world" lines. Awareness is important (mindfulness). If you want to live a long, healthy life, you need to be serious about making choices that lead to a long, healthy life. Don't smoke. Don't eat irresponsibly. Take care of your body. Get exercise. If you don't do these things, you aren't going to enjoy a long, healthy life. Proper Relaxation. Proper exercise. Proper Breathing. Proper Diet. Positive thinking and meditation.
The practice was simple, straight out of the Sivananda prescription, no surprises, no shortness of breath, anyone could do this, and comfortably. The teacher intertwined his lecture with the poses seamlessly, and it definitely put a very cool vibe to the experience. I had never known yoga to be this holistic, but here in this room it made sense.
And then the class took a turn I hadn't expected: The teacher opened the floor to questions from the class. That was completely new to me. Who asks questions in the middle of a yoga class? As it turns out, everybody. Not about the practice, either, but real, personal questions: difficulties recovering from injuries, difficulties communicating with relatives, difficulties adjusting to life changes, difficulties with holding onto personal beliefs in the face of obstacles and adversity, difficulty with taking care of oneself when too much energy gets spent taking care of others, trouble adapting the precepts of the teaching. And there were practical, if brief, answers to each, like a balm. This wasn't just a yoga class - this was a community, looking for direction from the teacher, who gives full credit to his guru.
So I understand why so many people at the retreat, like my mother, are completely dedicated to their weekly yoga class and so devoted to their teacher. To get a quick overview, there were 100 participants at this retreat, mostly middle aged women (but most if not all of the advanced students there were men). The oldest was in her mid-80's, and has been this teacher's student for 44 years. There were 4 women there who had been 40+ year students. Very few in the room had been students for less than a decade. At the vegetarian banquet dinner, an anniversary "tribute" video was screened, wherein a whole slew of students told about what a huge difference this teacher has made in their lives. The most popular statement, apparently, was that he "taught them patience," and helped them through some of the scarier or more difficult times in their lives. The love these students have for their teacher is absolutely real. All I could really think about in hearing all these accounts was: this teacher knew my mother when my parents had no money. He knew my mother when she was having kids, when she was butting heads with her daughter, when her parents died, when she was fighting breast cancer, when she was retiring. In a sense, I was meeting someone my mother called a yoga teacher, but was more practically an older, wiser friend who came just short of therapist, in a room of a hundred people with a similar story. It was extremely touching.
BUT. There's this nagging asterisk poking the back of my mind. False Buddha? (Someone I used to know wrote a great song about this kind of thing.)
I don't think so. It would be easy to look at someone who has a lot of charisma, who appears wise (or at least, wise enough), who people flock to and throw money at for direction and advice, and begrudge the guy for 'preying on the impressionable' or something to that tune. Here's the thing: I think this teacher honestly believes every word he speaks. I believe he is exactly what he claims to be. His fees notwithstanding, he's delivering a message of peace and strength to people who desperately want to hear it. He's helping people who want the help. I have trouble begrudging that. I would've liked some of the discussion to be more philosophical rather than dogmatic, more 'here's what suffering is and why it's a problem', and less 'the keys to life are a, b, and c, but I can understand why it wasn't (I think the answer involves the term Vinaya).
I got plenty of opportunities to talk to some of his students over the course of the weekend, too. Has Nat finally drank the kool-aid? I woke up in the morning on the second day of the retreat and walked the resort in my sweatpants and insanely comfortable shoes on a ravenous hunt for coffee (I can hear Mom in my head, saying "My yoga teacher doesn't drink any coffee at all"). Finding it took awhile. At breakfast mom and I sat with a group of women who spoke at length about the difficulties of vegetarianism and how their families are keeping them from going vegan. They spoke at length about their careful, conscientious food choices, complete with the spiritual slogans that come with them, until someone (not me) mentioned that she just can't give up her half-glass of wine with dinner. And then everyone else at the table agreed. An incredible guilt crossed the brave faces at the table, like watching keeping-up-with-the-Joneses-on-Facebook play itself out in real life, and it kind of made me sad. I looked at all of them and declared, "this is my third cup of coffee this morning, and I'm not sorry. This coffee is delicious." They would have been within their rights, in my opinion, to throw bread at me at that, but what I got instead was the sincerest gratitude. And then came the flood of honesty - everyday fears, everyday difficulties and day to day stuff, and some element of comfort, some element of sorority and common ground in knowing that the problems that plague you in your solitude are the same as those that plague others. Real connection, real compassion. Ordinary people, trying to get from today to tomorrow, and all of them blushing as they tell each other they hear their teacher's voice in their heads whenever they're grocery shopping, cooking, or are presented with 'problematic' ideas.
The weekend wasn't all feel-good-ness, though. The teacher stressed, "this isn't a yoga party. It's a yoga retreat." Some things didn't sit entirely well with me. I don't care for dogma, and I found some of the teachings bordering on the passive aggressive. My guard goes up when I'm told what to do or how to think, rather than being shown the argument and told to work it out. The official answer to that, I believe, would be that my ego is designed to dissuade me from seeing uncomfortable truths, or that I'm simply not ready to take the path seriously, and there's probably a strong argument to be made for both. There was some talk of past lives, but I'm neither Hindu nor Buddhist, and taking this idea literally rather than conceptually isn't worked into any metaphysical cosmology I'd bet on right now. And in general, I found this was not a very warm place for objectivity. I should have expected that - I've come across the 'just start practicing, the details will come later' approach to Eastern principles before. That said, I can agree to disagree, and I did find it curious that I genuinely looked forward to the next lecture, the next class, genuinely wanted to hear the man speak.
Sunday evening came along, the retreat came to an end, and when Mom asked what I thought of it, I didn't want to tell her I found it bittersweet, so I said as little as I could. Give it a few days, I thought, get back into work and routine and dirty laundry, get some perspective, but closer to the mark would be that I lost my objectivity. It was insidious. Over the course of the week, I found myself craving ayurvedic cooking and doing backward bends and stretches in the elevators, breathing exercises in the car. I caught a hot yoga class several days later, and found myself annoyed that so much was missing. Creepiest of all, I found myself hearing the yoga teacher's voice in my head and feeling guilty when, tired, I ordered a pizza for dinner, or every time I lit a cigarette or (believe it!) poured my third cup of coffee in the morning or walked through a store. Do I find myself believing in everything presented to me? Certainly not enough to pray, but maybe enough to throw some money at it. That I was affected, despite myself, is something worth considering.
Is this style of hatha yoga for you? Maybe, but I can't stress enough how different it is from mainstream fitness-oriented yoga. It really depends on what you want from it, and each offers things the other doesn't deliver. You won't work up a crazy sweat or be told to "find your own flow," but you'll come out of it with much more than your usual yoga-buzz. In a society where religion is quickly becoming a dirty word, the masses scramble for the ideology with which to hypocritically replace it and social identity groups and sub-classes clamber over each other pressing us to stand up and be counted, you could do worse than with a more natural practice based in the relative simplicity of human experience and human nature.
...And those are my thoughts for now.
more details? the parts I left out? email:
enoughtopray@gmail.com
Tuesday 2 February 2016
My Thoughts at Day 2, Ghomeshi Trial
I'd like to preface this by clarifying that I have nothing at stake in the outcome of the Jian Ghomeshi trial. Neither verdict will offend me, I have no hopes or expectations. I am not threatened by Mr. Ghomeshi, or those like him, and my sense of ethics is entirely dependent on whether the actions I take today allow me to look in the mirror tomorrow morning - and little else. I'm not anti-social-justice, but I tend more toward the anti-hysteria, anti-hypocrisy camp.
When the news about Mr. Ghomeshi broke, it meant nothing for my weekend. I wasn't a disappointed fan, and felt that too much of the case had to do with private exchanges, was plainly aware that we weren't being told the whole story by anyone, and frankly a complete stranger's *hm* preferences are none of my business. I had no opinion, and continue to have no opinion on the facts of the case. It's not my place to have an opinion. Quite honestly, who am I to judge?
But I spend a lot of time waiting in line in court offices all over southern Ontario, a lot of time on the road listening to the news (traffic on the ones!), and Twitter makes a good time-killer, so I looked up the trial and started following.
It's much more colourful than I thought it would be.
My impressions so far:
1. I serve legal documents for a living, and later wait around for hours at a time to file them at the courts. I've read hundreds of Statements of Claim, Defences, Motion Records, Facta, Divorce documents, small claims documents, etc. I've seen how nasty people can be to each other, and I hear, on a daily basis, how upset and frustrated litigants can get when the procedure gets confusing or when the consequences of missing a step or failing to comply creates hardship or inconvenience. I've stood next to vengeful people, telling anyone within earshot about the punishment they intend to exact. I've knocked on strangers' doors in the poorest and richest neighbourhoods, had people physically run from me, squared off in case the angry guy behind the door should start swinging, served in hospitals, detention centres, psych wards, and staked out fraudsters. I've seen people pursued by so many creditors they're afraid of their shadows, and I've seen people completely blindsided by being sued. I've seen families brutally biting into each other over pennies, had people cry on my shoulder on their doorstep in the dark, been invited into homes to hear about their most recent ventures. I've seen people I've served in other cities parked outside of my Mississauga mailbox.
When you see a lot of antagonism, you learn pretty quickly to reserve your judgment and not take anything personally or get too involved. A versus B, the truth is almost always somewhere in between, and more often than not, neither party is completely innocent. It's not victim-blaming, it's humanity.
So here I am watching this trial play out, and I'm aware - very aware - that there's plenty within the facts of the case I don't know. I don't count on the media to tell an objective truth, and for all the circus, it won't be over until the judge releases his decision. I'm okay with that. Knowing that nothing I think is going to impact the situation is refreshing. It gives me the leisure of sitting back and watching.
2. The tacks the Crown and Defense are taking are interesting to me because I haven't dealt with much criminal law. This is a learning experience. It's like watching a tennis or chess match. I find the commentary online by other lawyers useful. The more insight, the better. I wonder about what each side is concerned about at any given time, what everyone in the courtroom might be thinking, what the intended outcomes of their strategies might be.
3. I specify that I appreciate the online commentary of lawyers, because almost all of the other commentary is coming from third wave feminists. Yes, I know, it's Twitter and we can pretty much say anything we want (I repeat: pretty much!). But seeing the rabble rousing out there is dizzying, particularly when it's so entirely out of touch. See, when I think of the art of persuasion, I'm thinking of things like ameliorating oneself to the target, appearing agreeable and respectful, allowing everyone involved to save face, knowing when to cede, remaining non-hysterical, and offering space for positive, solution-oriented brainstorming, with a desired outcome mutually beneficial to all parties. Like an effective sales pitch. It's nothing new. (As a side-note, how is Dale Carnegie not mandatory reading in elementary schools?). But the popular trend I'm seeing is rather the opposite, which is also nothing new. There is significant outrage out there over the thought that accusers may need to answer painful questions. That's what happens when you effectively are the evidence. The hatred being spouted for defense lawyer, Marie Henein, and also for defense lawyers in general, is impressive, but misplaced. The general call is to lower the barriers for conviction in sexual assault cases, and never question the verity of victim statements. It's like the masses have all decided to turn off their intellect and let their mouths (and fingers) keep going. That's sad, because the procedure really isn't that complicated.
Complicated, however, is not the point for these warriors. They're not interested in justice - they're out for blood, and are bitter that anyone should need to sing for that supper. They're watching for any and every questionable turn of phrase, any comments that strike them as "other" than their own point of view, they're complaining about being triggered (which is ironic, because they are actually seeking out their triggers. Like masochists), and they're crying. What do they want? They want a man to spend the foreseeable future in jail, on claims that should be believed by virtue of the gender of the claimants alone. (Can you imagine the witch hunts that would follow if we gave anyone that much power? Yeesh!)
Don't get me wrong. I have no genuine hatred. What I'm seeing here is a lot of people hurting. It's easy to feel insignificant when the powers that be appear utterly uninterested in you. It's easy to lose touch when there's a cozy community not too far out of reach telling you there's a purpose to this fight and you're invited. Some of us spend a long time finding our place in the world. Others are happy to belong anywhere at all.
4. A note on language: words like "victim" and "survivor" seem prejudiced against the defendant in a situation where the accuser, again is the evidence. The spirit in which they have been used suggests (a) innocence (on which I have already opined), and (b) having risked or faced death in the ordeal (which remains to be demonstrated, to my mind). Using these words insinuates a situation in the same sense as when I say I was violently attacked by my kitchen to describe being scalded by spilled boiling water or getting in the way of a falling blade.
Correct me if I'm wrong. This is a learning experience for me.
5. Marie Henein is absolutely fascinating. I wonder how many community leaders are secretly jealous of her. Under different circumstances, she is exactly the woman we'd be celebrating. She's climbed to the top of a difficult and unsavoury profession that requires a hell of a backbone. Her intellect and skill are the cornerstone of her reputation. She has enough charisma to control a room by her mere presence (that charisma may have everything to do with being able to inspire fear, but truth be told, I don't think too many would actually be offended by the way that kind of power plays out). She is notably the "lawyer that lawyers call." Mother. Wife. Ambitious. Accomplished. Rich. Unaffected. And I'm just going to say it - smoking hot. Isn't this sort of the feminist dream?
I had never heard of Ms. Henein before yesterday, when a specific demographic of online gawkers suddenly got triggered and mass hysteria set in. I'm glad I looked up what the fuss was about. Marie Henein is absolutely fascinating. I'm fascinated.
When the news about Mr. Ghomeshi broke, it meant nothing for my weekend. I wasn't a disappointed fan, and felt that too much of the case had to do with private exchanges, was plainly aware that we weren't being told the whole story by anyone, and frankly a complete stranger's *hm* preferences are none of my business. I had no opinion, and continue to have no opinion on the facts of the case. It's not my place to have an opinion. Quite honestly, who am I to judge?
But I spend a lot of time waiting in line in court offices all over southern Ontario, a lot of time on the road listening to the news (traffic on the ones!), and Twitter makes a good time-killer, so I looked up the trial and started following.
It's much more colourful than I thought it would be.
My impressions so far:
1. I serve legal documents for a living, and later wait around for hours at a time to file them at the courts. I've read hundreds of Statements of Claim, Defences, Motion Records, Facta, Divorce documents, small claims documents, etc. I've seen how nasty people can be to each other, and I hear, on a daily basis, how upset and frustrated litigants can get when the procedure gets confusing or when the consequences of missing a step or failing to comply creates hardship or inconvenience. I've stood next to vengeful people, telling anyone within earshot about the punishment they intend to exact. I've knocked on strangers' doors in the poorest and richest neighbourhoods, had people physically run from me, squared off in case the angry guy behind the door should start swinging, served in hospitals, detention centres, psych wards, and staked out fraudsters. I've seen people pursued by so many creditors they're afraid of their shadows, and I've seen people completely blindsided by being sued. I've seen families brutally biting into each other over pennies, had people cry on my shoulder on their doorstep in the dark, been invited into homes to hear about their most recent ventures. I've seen people I've served in other cities parked outside of my Mississauga mailbox.
When you see a lot of antagonism, you learn pretty quickly to reserve your judgment and not take anything personally or get too involved. A versus B, the truth is almost always somewhere in between, and more often than not, neither party is completely innocent. It's not victim-blaming, it's humanity.
So here I am watching this trial play out, and I'm aware - very aware - that there's plenty within the facts of the case I don't know. I don't count on the media to tell an objective truth, and for all the circus, it won't be over until the judge releases his decision. I'm okay with that. Knowing that nothing I think is going to impact the situation is refreshing. It gives me the leisure of sitting back and watching.
2. The tacks the Crown and Defense are taking are interesting to me because I haven't dealt with much criminal law. This is a learning experience. It's like watching a tennis or chess match. I find the commentary online by other lawyers useful. The more insight, the better. I wonder about what each side is concerned about at any given time, what everyone in the courtroom might be thinking, what the intended outcomes of their strategies might be.
3. I specify that I appreciate the online commentary of lawyers, because almost all of the other commentary is coming from third wave feminists. Yes, I know, it's Twitter and we can pretty much say anything we want (I repeat: pretty much!). But seeing the rabble rousing out there is dizzying, particularly when it's so entirely out of touch. See, when I think of the art of persuasion, I'm thinking of things like ameliorating oneself to the target, appearing agreeable and respectful, allowing everyone involved to save face, knowing when to cede, remaining non-hysterical, and offering space for positive, solution-oriented brainstorming, with a desired outcome mutually beneficial to all parties. Like an effective sales pitch. It's nothing new. (As a side-note, how is Dale Carnegie not mandatory reading in elementary schools?). But the popular trend I'm seeing is rather the opposite, which is also nothing new. There is significant outrage out there over the thought that accusers may need to answer painful questions. That's what happens when you effectively are the evidence. The hatred being spouted for defense lawyer, Marie Henein, and also for defense lawyers in general, is impressive, but misplaced. The general call is to lower the barriers for conviction in sexual assault cases, and never question the verity of victim statements. It's like the masses have all decided to turn off their intellect and let their mouths (and fingers) keep going. That's sad, because the procedure really isn't that complicated.
Complicated, however, is not the point for these warriors. They're not interested in justice - they're out for blood, and are bitter that anyone should need to sing for that supper. They're watching for any and every questionable turn of phrase, any comments that strike them as "other" than their own point of view, they're complaining about being triggered (which is ironic, because they are actually seeking out their triggers. Like masochists), and they're crying. What do they want? They want a man to spend the foreseeable future in jail, on claims that should be believed by virtue of the gender of the claimants alone. (Can you imagine the witch hunts that would follow if we gave anyone that much power? Yeesh!)
Don't get me wrong. I have no genuine hatred. What I'm seeing here is a lot of people hurting. It's easy to feel insignificant when the powers that be appear utterly uninterested in you. It's easy to lose touch when there's a cozy community not too far out of reach telling you there's a purpose to this fight and you're invited. Some of us spend a long time finding our place in the world. Others are happy to belong anywhere at all.
4. A note on language: words like "victim" and "survivor" seem prejudiced against the defendant in a situation where the accuser, again is the evidence. The spirit in which they have been used suggests (a) innocence (on which I have already opined), and (b) having risked or faced death in the ordeal (which remains to be demonstrated, to my mind). Using these words insinuates a situation in the same sense as when I say I was violently attacked by my kitchen to describe being scalded by spilled boiling water or getting in the way of a falling blade.
Correct me if I'm wrong. This is a learning experience for me.
5. Marie Henein is absolutely fascinating. I wonder how many community leaders are secretly jealous of her. Under different circumstances, she is exactly the woman we'd be celebrating. She's climbed to the top of a difficult and unsavoury profession that requires a hell of a backbone. Her intellect and skill are the cornerstone of her reputation. She has enough charisma to control a room by her mere presence (that charisma may have everything to do with being able to inspire fear, but truth be told, I don't think too many would actually be offended by the way that kind of power plays out). She is notably the "lawyer that lawyers call." Mother. Wife. Ambitious. Accomplished. Rich. Unaffected. And I'm just going to say it - smoking hot. Isn't this sort of the feminist dream?
I had never heard of Ms. Henein before yesterday, when a specific demographic of online gawkers suddenly got triggered and mass hysteria set in. I'm glad I looked up what the fuss was about. Marie Henein is absolutely fascinating. I'm fascinated.
Sunday 3 January 2016
Death by Cabbage
I kind of feel like making a giant barrel of sauerkraut - the recipe calls for 1lb salt:40 lbs cabbage - and storing it in my Mom's basement to ferment for 4 weeks, just to see how she'd react.
If I wagered a guess, she'd kill me, but not right away. You see, I wouldn't ask - I'd just sneak it in while she's at yoga one day. She wouldn't know a thing until the smell kicks in. At that point, she'd panic, but not enough to change the locks on the doors. She'd check up on it every few days, as if it were orphaned and about to grow legs and crawl across the room. Whenever she'd ask about it (and she would. Frequently.), I'd make her a cocktail and tell her not to worry. At the 3-week point she'd get antsy, and I'd make a big show of being too busy to come by anytime soon. I'd show up on the last day of week 4, and tell her my kitchen isn't big enough to deal with 40 lbs of cabbage. That's when the real anxiety would start kicking in. I'd ask to use her kitchen (and she'd let me out of guilt - I'm the only daughter), which historically triggers this instinct in her that makes her follow me around the room, hover and micromanage, sometimes while holding sharp utensils. When I finished processing and packaging the sauerkraut, I'd give her the entire batch and tell her I don't like cabbage.
That's when she'd kill me.
Monday 12 October 2015
A Thought on Fear
I lie, and tell you I'm not scared, you lie and tell me you're not either, and we lock ourselves into the lines we've drawn in the sand and pull the covers over our heads, and the world moves on without us and our secret fears pound on the door, and we lose our grip on reality, lose touch, and grow to silently resent each other for not being the people we pretended to be.
I tell you I'm afraid, you tell me not to be, and I don't feel much better but I trust you to protect me and you try, but you grow anxious wondering if you're good enough, strong enough, brave enough for a job no one can possibly do, and when you disappoint me I grow angry and make you feel small, a fleeting attempt to make myself feel bigger, better, stronger than I am.
I tell you I'm afraid, you tell me you're afraid as well. You understand. We share our thoughts, our spectres, our demons, and though what scares us doesn't go away, life seems easier to swallow, in this moment our world is just a slight less lonely, and with nothing to prove we can carry on, a light for each other in the darkness.
Thursday 30 April 2015
A Haunting Story
This is someone else's story. I met Ron, a middle aged veteran, in a barroom in 2006. I was 23 years old, in my fourth year of university, talking to strangers and listening to their stories. Not all of them caught my attention, but some of them really made me think. Ron's was one of them, so much so that I wrote it down in a journal.
Ron got pretty emotional as he told me his story, and who could blame him? I knew we were going into the darkness when he started calling me by my name - almost nobody does - and by the end of the night he was crying on my shoulder. All he knew about me was that I wanted to write a war novel. I never saw him again. His story still haunts me. So, from my old journal:
____________________________________________________________________________
"You'll never learn the truth about war from a textbook. You listen to me, little girl. There is nothing glorious about war. You wanna know what goes through a soldier's head? It's 'Get me the fuck out of here.' And if it's a higher ranking officer, it's 'Get my men the fuck out of here.' Glory? It's fucking propaganda. That's the truth.
"And you know something? There is no worse feeling than bombing the shit out of a town, and then going into that town and seeing for yourself what you did. I once had to see the damage I did to a town. Our orders were to blow the town to smithereens, and we did. Then they told us to go into the town and finish the job. I followed my orders. I went into the town, and saw all the buildings destroyed, bodies lying in the street with their skin burned off, blood everywhere. And do you know what it was that made me cry? A dog. A dog, who had lost one of its legs. In the army, they teach you only how to kill. They train you not to care. But here was a crippled dog in a destroyed city, and it was all my fault. You know what I did? I followed my orders and finished my job.
"Now, sweetheart, I never said I killed anyone.
"You want the truth, Natalie, I'll tell you the truth. And you can spread the word. I don't like talking about these things. That war was thirty years ago, and I still get nightmares when I think about it. You try to move on with your life, but how can you?
"You know something? I was in a POW camp in Vietnam. I was in a POW camp, and I escaped. I escaped on foot, with a razorblade. How do you think I escaped with just a razorblade? What do you think I had to do? Natalie, not a day goes by when I don't think about it. I remember each one of their faces. It was one thing to shoot weapons from far away, but how do you kill a man face to face? And I had to! It was all I could do! I watched as my friends had the shit shot out of them! I saw what happened to the people in the POW camp, and all I could think was 'It's not happening to me,' and I got my hands on a razorblade and did what I had to do.
"They sent us out there to kill, and we killed. I think about it everyday. And when we got back, they didn't want us. The only job I could get when I came back was as a cook! They wouldn't let us into the Legions because we'd lost the war. We didn't lose the war! We shouldn't have been there! They never wanted us there! I don't want pity. I was a soldier doing what I had to do to survive. But you know, the circumstances don't matter. The war doesn't matter, and the danger doesn't matter. There's only one word for what happened, and it's Murder.
"At the Legion, we never talk about what we've been through. We go there for a drink, for a laugh. We ignore the rest of it. Nobody wants to think about fighting in a war. They know the truth.
"I look at what's going on these days in the Middle East. All these kids they're sending out, sending home in coffins. It's such a waste. A buddy of mine asked me how long it would take me to take down a town out there, and I told him twenty minutes - and I'd flatten everything in the way. They're sending kids out there who don't know what they're doing. They should send us old guys. I mean, I know I can't fit into a tank like I used to, but damnit, we've done it before! We'd get the job done quicker!
"This world's a mess, and us old guys should clean up the mess for you young people. You shouldn't be out there, learning how to kill from scratch. People your age should be studying and partying and making love -"
"...And writing books," I interrupted. For the first time in awhile, Ron smiled. He cupped my face with his hands and then hugged me.
"God Bless you," he said. "You put this in your book."
(2006)
Ron got pretty emotional as he told me his story, and who could blame him? I knew we were going into the darkness when he started calling me by my name - almost nobody does - and by the end of the night he was crying on my shoulder. All he knew about me was that I wanted to write a war novel. I never saw him again. His story still haunts me. So, from my old journal:
____________________________________________________________________________
"You'll never learn the truth about war from a textbook. You listen to me, little girl. There is nothing glorious about war. You wanna know what goes through a soldier's head? It's 'Get me the fuck out of here.' And if it's a higher ranking officer, it's 'Get my men the fuck out of here.' Glory? It's fucking propaganda. That's the truth.
"And you know something? There is no worse feeling than bombing the shit out of a town, and then going into that town and seeing for yourself what you did. I once had to see the damage I did to a town. Our orders were to blow the town to smithereens, and we did. Then they told us to go into the town and finish the job. I followed my orders. I went into the town, and saw all the buildings destroyed, bodies lying in the street with their skin burned off, blood everywhere. And do you know what it was that made me cry? A dog. A dog, who had lost one of its legs. In the army, they teach you only how to kill. They train you not to care. But here was a crippled dog in a destroyed city, and it was all my fault. You know what I did? I followed my orders and finished my job.
"Now, sweetheart, I never said I killed anyone.
"You want the truth, Natalie, I'll tell you the truth. And you can spread the word. I don't like talking about these things. That war was thirty years ago, and I still get nightmares when I think about it. You try to move on with your life, but how can you?
"You know something? I was in a POW camp in Vietnam. I was in a POW camp, and I escaped. I escaped on foot, with a razorblade. How do you think I escaped with just a razorblade? What do you think I had to do? Natalie, not a day goes by when I don't think about it. I remember each one of their faces. It was one thing to shoot weapons from far away, but how do you kill a man face to face? And I had to! It was all I could do! I watched as my friends had the shit shot out of them! I saw what happened to the people in the POW camp, and all I could think was 'It's not happening to me,' and I got my hands on a razorblade and did what I had to do.
"They sent us out there to kill, and we killed. I think about it everyday. And when we got back, they didn't want us. The only job I could get when I came back was as a cook! They wouldn't let us into the Legions because we'd lost the war. We didn't lose the war! We shouldn't have been there! They never wanted us there! I don't want pity. I was a soldier doing what I had to do to survive. But you know, the circumstances don't matter. The war doesn't matter, and the danger doesn't matter. There's only one word for what happened, and it's Murder.
"At the Legion, we never talk about what we've been through. We go there for a drink, for a laugh. We ignore the rest of it. Nobody wants to think about fighting in a war. They know the truth.
"I look at what's going on these days in the Middle East. All these kids they're sending out, sending home in coffins. It's such a waste. A buddy of mine asked me how long it would take me to take down a town out there, and I told him twenty minutes - and I'd flatten everything in the way. They're sending kids out there who don't know what they're doing. They should send us old guys. I mean, I know I can't fit into a tank like I used to, but damnit, we've done it before! We'd get the job done quicker!
"This world's a mess, and us old guys should clean up the mess for you young people. You shouldn't be out there, learning how to kill from scratch. People your age should be studying and partying and making love -"
"...And writing books," I interrupted. For the first time in awhile, Ron smiled. He cupped my face with his hands and then hugged me.
"God Bless you," he said. "You put this in your book."
(2006)
Friday 3 April 2015
"Fragile" (painting by Rick Hicks, Toronto, ON)
"The name of the painting is inspired by the Yes album of the same name. The colours I used are similar to those of the artist who did that cover, Roger Dean. My style is loosely based on Jackson Pollock and the French Canadian painter, Jean Paul Riopelle. Back in 2013, I did over 120 paintings on paper boards, which were inspired by them."
Rick Hicks
Toronto, ON
Rick Hicks
Toronto, ON
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)